Government & Public Sector
State AI executive orders are arriving faster than most agencies can build the evidence to answer them.
The risk
Agencies and public-sector organizations are adopting AI tools for constituent-facing services and internal workflows, often ahead of any formal governance program. That creates exposure of constituent data and gaps in procurement and audit compliance that surface at the worst possible time.
- Constituent-facing AI services
- Internal administrative AI workflows
- Public-safety dispatch & records AI
- Adoption ahead of formal governance programs
Regulatory context
State AI executive orders and policies, constituent data exposure, procurement and audit compliance, and CJIS/StateRAMP-adjacent considerations all shape what "acceptable AI use" looks like for your agency.
What we assess
We help you build evidence and controls aligned to your state's AI executive orders and procurement/audit requirements. We never claim to "make you compliant" — we help you build the evidence and controls behind it.
- Alignment with your state's AI executive orders
- Constituent data exposure mapping
- Procurement- and audit-ready documentation
- CJIS/StateRAMP-adjacent considerations
- Public-safety and first-responder AI workflows
- Uptime- and trust-sensitive access governance
Public safety and first responders
Public-safety agencies — including Fire and EMS departments — are adopting AI-assisted dispatch, records, and administrative tools under real operational pressure, often without a formal review process. We've done AI security assessment work built specifically for this kind of public-sector environment, where uptime, constituent trust, and audit readiness all matter at once.
Your constituents don't see the AI behind the service — they see whether their data was protected.
Build the evidence your next audit will ask for.
Start with the 30-Day AI Security Readiness Assessment, scoped to your constituent-facing and internal AI workflows.